Accueil » In English » Anders Behring Breivik : Norway feminist’s society has gone too far.
AIMELES Antiféminisme

Anders Behring Breivik : Norway feminist’s society has gone too far.

Publié le 30 septembre 2011 par Léonidas Durandal à 0 h 00 min

 

The first sentence in this case which has made me jump was this one of his father saying that he disowned his son:

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/norway/8660398/Father-of-Norway-mass-murderer-Breivik-my-son-should-have-killed-himself.html

 

before committing his crimes, Anders Behring Breivik was convinced that his family would hate him. In reading his book, I thought it was very strange that he had got this idea, and this was worse when I have heard his father, and that I observed that his son was right. Could we lose the love of our parents because of what we have done? To show us that he was not crazy, as the common will say it a little bit easily, He had foreseen all of our thoughts, thoroughly in his book (2083 a european declaration of independence) he described how a system would react to the serial of killings that he was going to commit. He did not want to be labeled too quickly. This highlights how much it is difficult to counter ideologically the thought of Anders Behring Breivik, because he anticipates on this subject, like on the others. He foresee each of our thoughts.

 

He knocks out us with his knowledge of the Islam ( first hundreds of pages) to show us that he is speaking of a subject he mastered. Anders Behring Breivik is not a loser, but he agreed to pose as a loser. Anders Behring Breivik was a Freemason

Breivik

of high degree for his age and his masters had recognized him as someone of very clever they wanted to bring him up. An

 

ders Behring Breivik was beautiful, became millionaire before 25 year old(p1380) by its own means, surrounded of friends (p1381), and capable of humility. This picture does not suffer from any imperfection according to our modern standards. And so Anders Behring Breivik had wished it : he didn’t want to suffer of crazy caricatures even though he knew this was unavoidable.

 

 

On the ideological question, I must admit that I have discovered a whole world that I had approached, but which was unknown to me until then, or at least not so explicitly.

 

Considering that the cultural Marxism is gaining in Europe, tyrannizing any divergent thinking by the « political correctness » of our newspapers and the dismissal of all those who oppose this ideology (p1382), considering that the hatred of the european indigenous cultures was itself deeply inlaid because of the cultural Marxism, considering that this cultural Marxism left Europe to be invaded by a deadly ideology that made thousands of time more deaths than Christianity (Islam) (p44), considering all the lies, all hypocrisies, the inconsistencies of this cultural Marxism, of our newspapers, of our elites, considering the sluggishness of western men, and their weak propensity to defend themselves, considering that feminists have tried to emasculate him at school because of their female education (p854), Anders Behring Breivik has decided to accomplish an action of ultimate freedom by killing those « traitors », in an operation which he considered both exemplary and self-defensive.

 

Who would not want to be a righter of wrongs, to be right above of all the others, to be a « modern Knight Templar » courageous and steadfast? 2083-AEuropeanDeclarationofIndependence CEC619B8 pic0032

 

Anders Behring Breivik poses strong arguments, and ideologically, the cultural Marxism has no means to respond him (what he also stressed in his book, anticipating the silence of the media prefering to tell that he was a fool rather than counter him with arguments :

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/870956-anders-behring-breivik-is-bad-not-mad-says-top-medical-expert).

 

What reasoning follows Anders Behring Breivik and how could we counter him if it’s possible?

 

Anders Behring Breivik believes that the future will take place as follows: in the first stage, the main will be the awareness of the cause, because, in a second stage when the cultural Marxism will have completely failed, Islamic immigration in Europe, and social unrest will be so great that the Europeans will have to take up the arms, and in a third stage, will have to fight and then deport the Muslims. His thinking takes place in a civilizations’s clash assumed and inevitable. So he decided to eliminate the European traitors that are responsible for this clash of civilizations: the politicians, the marxist traitors, journalists (for example). His logical demonstration is baffling, it is almost irrefutable so much he provides arguments and statistics. What’s more, he affords the luxury of the optimism. Far from yielding to any defeatism, he is convinced that the Europeans in 30 years will begin to react and that in 80 years they will have won this battle (P705). He believes in the European victory against the Islam that he regards as inherently barbaric. For him, the survival of our culture justifies any act of war including his own. Throughout his book, in all its philosophical approach, I saw him pushing aside only one single idea: that a victory of Islam might be preferable to a victory of this cultural Marxism and to its extension to the entire world. Here is one idea he ignores.

 

This may seem anecdotal, but in a spirit as this one of Anders Behring Breivik, there is nothing really anecdotal. For me the only possible or likely explanation is that a struggle against the entire cultural Marxism, not against Islam, would remove him the glory of being recognized in the eyes of his kinfolk (who are very often cultural marxists). Anders Behring Breivik does not seek only the truth, but also the love of his own family. He wants to be the savior of his country. And despite what he may think, there is a psychological reason to that, and it is the lack of love from his father and from the rest of his family (p1358). I do not dispute the fact that he wanted to accomplish a free act, and that there is successful. I do not even challenge his logic but I question his motivation and his ideological path. His whole career proves it: to be recognized in the hip-hop, and after in his Masonic lodge, and now to become a martyr at Europe’s eyes.

 

 

Until the end he will declare acting on behalf of those that he loves (p1463). The desire of recognition is one of the worst prisons of the heart. He has this family flaw in him, but this is not the only one. He is not so stupid to not integrate his personal situation in the whole society. The painting of the Norwegian social environment which he makes us the description is terrible : families completely deconstructed, reconstituted families where he comes, the families of the deception and of the sex, of a Protestant society much more liberated than ours, sexually diseases that caused the degeneracy 2083-AEuropeanDeclarationofIndependence CEC619B8 pic0004

 

of the intellectual capacities of his mother to 10 years old (p1172) and the lack of fertility of his sister (P1386). He also describes the cynicism of people interested only in their work (p1117). He forgives all his entourage, without concession, but he has decided to react.

 

He wants to believe that they are not doomed to slavery. He wants to save their soul. But thus, he goes beyond its prerogatives of being human. As a result, I do not see why he wants to save that bunch of idiots rather than encouraging a structured Islam. At the end, we can not save people from themselves, even if, in fact, these people need to be saved. Individual salvation is private although the community allow the individual development or not.

The marxist cultural and the conservative right have taken him for a fool, and as he had predicted it, they torture him ,in keeping him in isolation (http://www.newser.com/story/128919/norway-killer-anders-behring-breivik-calls-isolation-torture-at-hearing-today.html

read comments very enlightening on the subject), they judge him without any morality, and in their weakness, they are keeping silence as for his ideas. They insist in their hypocrisy and in their lies. A survivor of the massacre said that Anders Behring Breivik had failed to convince.

 

I’m not sure he understood the stakes of the war that Anders Behring Breivik is leading. As for his family actually, they hate him.

 

All, by the path they follow, give him reason.

 

From the depth of the web galaxy, in the border, I sound a note may be a little bit hopeless …

 

If the cultural marxists really want to counter Anders BehringBreivik, they will have to love him, they will have to answer to him with love. Before requiring his self-criticism, they will have to make their own self-criticism. Anders Behring Breivik think that they are unable to do it, this is the reason why he decided to lead by example by eliminating them. History invariably will show who was right. Here there will be a fight between Anders Behring Breivik with his mechanical, and cultural Marxism in its totalitarian position. But I believe it would be possible to get out of these determinations by a third way: that of love.

 

Anders Behring Breivik is right: yes, feminism has destroyed our families, trying to extend the totalitarian control of women in the whole society, yes Islam has two faces: a practice for pacifying society but intolerance for those who are not included, yes cultural Marxism in the West has won, it initiated a hatred of our cultures and thus began a process of collective suicide. 2083-AEuropeanDeclarationofIndependence CEC619B8 pic000B In fulfilling our destiny, could it be possible to fight without having to enter into a series of massacres? Could it be possible that the common sense of the men come back and be accepted in our societies, and why not, that the western men put a little authority and legitimacy in their actions and avoid succumbing to female victimization manipulation. Even if I doubt, even if experience shows me that, of Anders Behring Breiviks are often right in the history, I want to believe that an alternative way is possible.

 

Anders Behring Breivik defined himself as a non-believer Catholic, as a « cultural Catholic » (he abandoned Protestantism that fails in its lack of unity. The important ideas have been recovered by the Catholic Church). Along the way, I think he missed the main: he failed to cultivate a relationship with God. There is no catholic culture without catholic faith. The non-practicing is alone with the devil, quickly picked up by a bunch of deviant thoughts, here a measureless pride. Anders Breivik Behring built a psychological Tower of Babel from which he will come down soon. The experience has always proved him that he was right, the devil has given him the world in his hands, and alone to fight, he yielded to the temptation, defining himself clearly as the one who brings the light, definition of the fallen angel (p1435) . Going out of a Masonic lodge, Anders Behring Breivik maintains the same relationship to God as Lucifer. Lucifer believes in God but does not want to serve him. He rushes the world which does not deserve God, which does not deserve the Father, he the son of the widow (who has killed the father), he who possess the world while God let him do, he who has gone up above the Father, looking for ad infinitum a limitless gratitude and absolute. Yet, there is a greater force than death in this world, which can beat the devil, there is a greater force than the oppression and than the totalitarian political correctness of some marxists.

 

If his father does not pose an act of love for his son, he proves him right: Anders Behring Breivik surpasses him by far.

 

If our own society does not accept his explanation, it proves him right, the clash of the civilizations is inevitable.

 

If every westerner ignores Anders Behring Breivik, he will have to suffer the consequences of its choices and the result could be a massacre

 

The devil gains the world by our lacks of love. We don’t have to love those ones who are closest from us, but those who are furthest from us, as Jesus taught us. As Anders Behring Breivik, dragons of heaven or of the earth, we must choose. He decided to defend the earth, like the cultural marxists, or the feminists .. They prefere the chaos rather than give up their ideas, and this, to save us. The days when we hadn’t choosing, seems over. More and more it will be asked us, even ignorant, to position ourselves and of this position will depend on our salvation and the near future of our societies. In this bloody pell-mell the very notion of good and evil may, once again, become unclear, even for the most enlightened of us. Before that, let’s see if we can eradicate the feminism and the cultural Marxism, or if they persist in their totalitarian folly. Try to live with Islam : without promoting massive immigration which is used to empty the working masses of all their energies in atrocious conditions. Just try to stay as long as we can, human, if it is allowed to us.

Laisser un commentaire

Premier commentaire ou VPN ? Le commentaire sera mis en attente de validation

-

Votre sexe SVP :

-

Ce site utilise Akismet pour réduire les indésirables. En savoir plus sur comment les données de vos commentaires sont utilisées.