Publié le 20 juin 2011 par Léonidas Durandal à 0 h 00 min
1 Timothy 2 9
I also want the women to dress modestly,
with decency and propriety, adorning themselves,
not with elaborate hairstyles or gold or pearls or expensive clothes,
10 but with good deeds, appropriate for women
who profess to worship God.
They call themselves sluts … all is said.
It doesn’t happen by chance, this movement would come from Canada, where the worst feminisms is raging. Today, we should assume ourself all of our desires, to not fall into perversion. The rules and the law would cause disorder. uninhibited from all, guilt-free, we would have all rights. Men should keep quiet!
But the world can not function like this. Rules and social laws are intended to limit violence between individuals, to take care all of us. Each time we want to ignore this rule, each time we do not know that there are people with different motivations on this planet (you know that men exist ?), more great disorders are caused than those that we believed prevent. Such is the case right now concerning women’s clothing in the West. As men, we do not have to accept the vulgarity of women’s clothes who would be totally naked in the streets because “their bodies would belong to them.” In the name of this dogma, feminists have already committed the worst crimes of humanity: the holocaust of abortion on the altar of our materialism. In the name of this dogma, they have reduced social relations to a hyper-sexualization, to complain themselves later being victims of sexual harassment. Now they want to dress as they wish, always because “their bodies belong to them”. But let us look a little closer to this attitude.
In everyday language, it is accepted that we are not allowed to say anything : you can’t insult someone, defame, to lay false accusations, and it is morally wrong to lie for personal reasons, to lower a particular individual, to propagate rumors and slanders.
As our language, our body has a special language that regulates social relations, that ritualizes them, to contain many forms of violence. A woman who dresses like a slut sends several messages (and I do not mean what she think to send but what she really sends)
_ My body belongs to all who look at me. Yes, contrary to what say those who dress anyhow, when someone let see private parts of his intimacy, he’s abandoned, in part, the ownership of his body. What would be said about a celebrity who would communicate in the newspapers on his privacy by saying “you do not have the right to read these newspapers because of my privacy” He would be accused of hypocrisy. Though she can think, the message of a slut is explicit: “I let you see what you are entitled to see,” and in this case you have the right to see everything almost. The bodies of women who send us such a message, belong to us in sight.
_ Fuck me. Why a woman who would want that anyone see her naked, would not want to go further in this “gift” for all. She sends the message: “I am free for all, you can get closer”, If a woman tries to seduce, the natural consequence is that we attempt to seduce her? No? Except to believe that the body does not speak, that there is no message in clothing, that what is inside does not match the outside. In this case, we would be dealing with crazy. This is why, she probably says :
_ Fuck you.I am beautiful, I’m young, I have all rights, I exert my power over the poor sexual objects that you are, male. This kind of attitude tends to maintain a stranglehold on men by the sexualization of all the social relations: a woman who let herself go to excite a man, to get what she wants is by definition a whore: she acquires a power in exchange for another. She excites men who want to satisfy their natural inclinations, who want to get easy affection. Now, they close this free access to sexuality by saying later that this was not what they wanted, their desire to be filled with tenderness was not this one (what is sometimes very false). The legal right to play “>